If the publisher breaches the criteria again within the next six months, the Governor can publicly identify the offender and comment on the reasons for declaring their work in breach. Any publisher who has more than six works declared harmful under the new criteria in a 12-month period can be referred to the relevant industry self-regulation body.The definition of harmful material is expanded to include "any manga, animation, or pictures (but not including real life pictures or footage) that features either sexual or pseudo sexual acts that would be illegal in real life, or sexual or pseudo sexual acts between close relatives whose marriage would be illegal, where such depictions and / or presentations unjustifiably glorify or exaggerate the activity.".The Metropolitan government is given the authority to propose controls on internet access for children of different ages, although it is required to consult with the telecommunications industry, parents' representatives and educators.It removed the controversial "non-existent youth" term but still proposed a number of significant changes to the law:
This revision, informally referred to as Bill 156, was submitted by the government in November 2010. From the Wikipedia article:Īfter the original bill's defeat, Tokyo governor Shintarō Ishihara announced his intent to submit a new revision later in the year. The relevant part is in a change called Bill 156 which was passed in 2010. There's a fairly vague rule called the Tokyo Metropolitan Ordinance Regarding the Healthy Development of Youths that is used to restrict access to "harmful material" to people under the age of 18.
If you look at this question, you can read about censorship laws in Japan and about how-through self-censorship as much as through legal restrictions-genitalia and public hair aren't generally shown even in pornography. To start, you're not really going to see full-frontal nudity in anime.
0 kommentar(er)
